I had a copy of Alpha Five several years back and found it to be unworkable for my needs at that time. I have come full circle now looking for a product that would make development possible without hurting myself--I think that means robust, easy to use and you can pick up the documentation without getting a hernia. On the other hand, the documents need to be other than criptic. I have kicked the tires on R:Base, Filemaker, Access, Delphi and find each f these to be too much of a gulp (Delphi), weak and skinny (Filemaker), obtuse (R:Base) and just plain silly (Access). So, as a kick the tires mode user I would like to know:
1) Does xbasic come with the $129 version? I did not come with the lowest level product offering in the past and I do not see an explicit statement about it on the web site.
2) Can the code be compiled?
3) Does it operate on a network without the network optimization module. This is important in kick the tires mode -- If I fell into a serious network need I would be more than happy to acquire the optimization module in the future.
4) Is the current version of XBasic a) a traditionally procedure oriented language or b) an attempt to cram object oriented constructs into a language platform that never wanted it in the first place or c) a reasonable and understandable object oriented language. Clearly answer (b) is the bad one but answer (C) can have serious implications in the area of application support. I am finding that most of my client sites are still more productive in development and support when object oriented languages are not used. (I wonder if anyone else has that experience?)
Many thanks for any insits you you folks can provide.
1) Does xbasic come with the $129 version? I did not come with the lowest level product offering in the past and I do not see an explicit statement about it on the web site.
2) Can the code be compiled?
3) Does it operate on a network without the network optimization module. This is important in kick the tires mode -- If I fell into a serious network need I would be more than happy to acquire the optimization module in the future.
4) Is the current version of XBasic a) a traditionally procedure oriented language or b) an attempt to cram object oriented constructs into a language platform that never wanted it in the first place or c) a reasonable and understandable object oriented language. Clearly answer (b) is the bad one but answer (C) can have serious implications in the area of application support. I am finding that most of my client sites are still more productive in development and support when object oriented languages are not used. (I wonder if anyone else has that experience?)
Many thanks for any insits you you folks can provide.
Comment